graculus: (Thoughtful Daniel)
[personal profile] graculus
A quote from someone over on Our Stargate forum:

"A show that lasts 8 years at some point outlasts its source material."

Is it me, or is that an incredibly sad statement to be making about any show? Particularly one so rich in potential (most of it unrealised, particularly in recent years) as Stargate SG-1?

Maybe I'm just being maudlin, but that kind of statement doesn't take into account the deliberate dismantling and discarding of said source material, the shoehorning in of other elements that make it just like every other show in place of the things that made SG distinct and special. The things that got so many of us to make the jump from the movie to the tv show and keep on watching, cheesy as some of season 1 was.

But apparently the people who came into the fandom from the movie over-estimate the importance of Jack and Daniel, we neglect Sam and Teal'c because of it. The unspoken implication is this makes us selfish.That we should have embraced the (for many of us, much less interesting) new characters and consider them equal to the original.

Well, I'd say I like Teal'c way better than I like Jack nowadays (and lets not even get into the whole Carter thing), but I don't think that was what they meant...

Date: 2004-07-07 09:29 pm (UTC)
thenightsfall: (Grief. Courtesy of lerefuge.)
From: [personal profile] thenightsfall
In the case of Stargate, rather than a matter of outliving the original source material, I think it's a matter of disavowing it even exists, including Seasons 1-3, when certain yahoos took over in Season 4. (All due apologies to Yahoo! for taking their name in vain.) Worst thing that ever happened to this show, that change in personnel.

March 2021

S M T W T F S
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031   

Most Popular Tags

Page Summary

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jan. 25th, 2026 01:08 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios