(no subject)

[graculus]

Someone on my friendslist was ranting about the word 'cum' the other day and I just read something else that needs to be considered with equal derision (imo) - the phrase 'anal pucker'. To be honest, is 'anal pucker' sexy or erotic in any way? I think not.

Comments

[rivier.livejournal.com]

I'm sure I read about a 'hungry ass' in the last couple of days. Completely put me off my supper!

Then again, I'm the reader who never, under any circumstances, wants to read about spunk dripping down anyone's thighs after anal sex. Because here's the thing - if your arsehole is loose enough for that to happen, it isn't just semen that's going to be...

I know whereof I speak! No dripping *anythings*!

It's right up there with weeping cocks, in the pantheon of phrases that take the erotic out of 'erotic stories' and kick it to death.

[graculus.livejournal.com]

While there's reasonable evidence for the old trouser snake having a mind of its own, the idea of sentient arseholes (other than Dubya, that is) is somewhat scary... and no, I can't say I find the dripping bits all that sexy either, at least most of the time.

[xochiquetzl]

I was once at a multifannish slash gathering where someone (thermidor, in fact) had just read a story where someone had a "greedy asshole."