Had lunch with
rivier yesterday, sadly cut short by my need to get back to work for supervision (and thus sadly also booze-free for me and booze-lite for
rivier) where she again tried in a futile manner to persuade me I needed to join the big shiny fandom of suckitude.
Not. Going. To. Happen.
no subject
Date: 2005-08-16 05:38 pm (UTC)Anyway, you'd only be disappointed: Rodney wears clean underpants. And washes his hair at least 1500 times a year more than... certain fandoms' Beloved Desired Objects.
So how did the assessment go?
no subject
Date: 2005-08-16 06:35 pm (UTC)Besides which, not being part of the blessed circle jerk, how could I ever compete? ;)
As for my supervision, well it was a terrible anti-climax. But I smile and think of the money (or at least I will when they eventually pay me!).
no subject
Date: 2005-08-16 05:39 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-08-16 06:34 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-08-16 09:27 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-08-16 09:32 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-08-16 06:28 pm (UTC)Must rec some SG-1 fic. Yes. That's what I must do.
no subject
Date: 2005-08-16 06:36 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-08-16 07:14 pm (UTC)It's almost as bad as Firefly ;-)
no subject
Date: 2005-08-16 07:19 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-08-16 08:16 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-08-16 08:18 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-08-16 08:28 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-08-16 08:42 pm (UTC)Please? My oldest friend from back home has fallen in lovely with SGA, and while the only fringe benefit is that she's showing interest in SG-1 after 8 years of me being here (*facepalm*), she's still trying to get me to join.
But I survived RPS and LOTR. I will not get sucked in. :)
no subject
Date: 2005-08-16 08:16 pm (UTC)at least my friends understand the futility of attempting to drag me into shiny new fandom.
Your determined Illya icon looks quite like he's doing something else...
no subject
Date: 2005-08-16 08:20 pm (UTC)And as for IK, I guess it depends on what he's determined about. ;)
no subject
Date: 2005-08-16 08:47 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-08-16 09:30 pm (UTC)Eh, back to the silly fluffy candytuft crackporn I go.
no subject
Date: 2005-08-16 09:35 pm (UTC)That or the crackporn is making you jumpy at the moment, one or the other... poor Colleen is *never* satisfied (are you, love?), so don't you get your knickers knotted over imagined slights to the shinyness.
no subject
Date: 2005-08-16 09:45 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-08-16 09:49 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-08-16 11:22 pm (UTC):P
no subject
Date: 2005-08-16 11:28 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-08-17 01:10 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-08-17 05:30 am (UTC)I tell you, it's so much easier when dealing with dead fandoms. No waiting on tenterhooks every week, wondering if your canon is going to lift you to the heights of joy or piss all over you...the tension is killing me. ;)
no subject
Date: 2005-08-17 05:24 am (UTC)I am glad that you are enjoying the show so much, and I think most of the members of the fandom would agree with you wholeheartedly. Obviously I would not count myself among that group, but then again, I have never liked any of the source material in my fandoms as much as I like the fic that it inspires. I can understand the enjoyment of SGA just fine from a fannish perspective; the banter and bickering between the characters is a lot of fun, the acting is generally terrific, and there are often wonderful moments in the eps that provide great material for fanfic. (Plus, I'm pretty shallow, and would basically be happy to watch David Hewlett reading aloud from the phone book.) But on a non-fannish level, I am bothered by the show's plot holes, gaps in logic, lack of originality, and inconsistency between the episodes; enough so that it ruins my overall appreciation of the show itself.
Personally I'm damned glad SGA is not bloody Dostoevsky, as I always thought he was a bit of a pretentious bore. And I have no doubt that, were I ever unfortunate enough to encounter such a creature as a "wonderful academically impeccable fandom," it would be equally unbearable. However, I don't think that I'm necessarily committing some terrible fannish faux pas when I wish for tighter, smarter, more interesting and original scripts from my fannish shows, and then express dissatisfaction when I am disappointed. I don't believe that SGA is complete dross, or I wouldn't bother watching; but I do think it could be, and is capable of being, much, much better. (Just as a start, canonical variations of
no subject
Date: 2005-08-16 09:43 pm (UTC)What can I say? I have no drums to bang. I like what I like, that's the end of it.
no subject
Date: 2005-08-16 09:50 pm (UTC)