Degrees of dissonance

[graculus]

In the six or seven years I've been in fandom, I've read widely in a number of fandoms. I'm wondering if my tolerance levels are the same as they were, or whether it changes as new fandoms gain my interest, or is dependent on the fandom itself.

I've been reading a lot of Harry Potter fic recently. Some of it is excellent and some of it can only be described as god-awful. In essence, no better and no worse than any other fandom, as far as I can see. But where it differs in one respect is the couple of fics I've given up on early on because they just don't work - there's some fundamental flaw to the story premise that is only evident to me because I have a knowledge of the law and mores of the culture the stories are based in (not the wizarding world, of course, but mid-90's England).

So, I was wondering about this - I know there are people reading this entry that read in an equally wide variety of fandoms, or focus intently on one to the exclusion of all others, people with a wide variety of life experiences and areas of expertise. Can you get past a glaring error in something you have knowledge of and move on to read the rest of the story? Are you someone who, once they've started reading something, have to finish it? Or is it dependent on the quality of the tale, that if it's good enough then you can ignore something you know to be incorrect?

Inquiring minds and all that...

Comments

[graculus.livejournal.com]

Well I'm really meticulous with research. I make sure that factual stuff is correct. I even like to do background research that I might not actually use for a story, but like to know anyway.

I was curious about this because I always try and do as much research as I can (it partly comes from being in a fandom where there are way too many people who'll notice straight away if you mess up on the medical stuff in particular, but also from being a perfectionist control freak...) and I wondered if those of us who are insistent on researching our stuff are more or less tolerant of other people's mistakes and/or omissions?

And I think you have mentioned the food sex kink before. It's something that doesn't do anything for me, so I tend to skip that kind of thing... ;)

[nakeisha.livejournal.com]

I wondered if those of us who are insistent on researching our stuff are more or less tolerant of other people's mistakes and/or omissions?

And I've proved that this isn't the case, at least not for me ::sigh:: I'm tolerant of other folks, but not my own :-))

And I think you have mentioned the food sex kink before.

LOL It does tend to crop up from time to time :-)

so I tend to skip that kind of thing...

I really wish I could just skip it, but.... I can't.