The Guardian:
"Members of the British public had donated more than £30m for the victims of the tsunami disaster by last night, the speed and generosity of the response amazing charity bosses."
I feel I should also add that the British government suddenly tripled its input to the international effort to help the victims of this crisis when it became apparent that the public were going to be giving more money than they were... ;)
"Members of the British public had donated more than £30m for the victims of the tsunami disaster by last night, the speed and generosity of the response amazing charity bosses."
I feel I should also add that the British government suddenly tripled its input to the international effort to help the victims of this crisis when it became apparent that the public were going to be giving more money than they were... ;)
no subject
Date: 2004-12-31 12:27 pm (UTC)This shouldn't be a power play, but with Bush that's exactly what it's become. And, of course, neither Bush nor Blair came back from their holidays. Why would they? They're politicians, not statesmen.
no subject
Date: 2004-12-31 12:35 pm (UTC)Some might say the less those two have to do with anything directly, the better...
no subject
Date: 2004-12-31 12:39 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-12-31 12:51 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-12-31 12:49 pm (UTC)It says:
Several countries have pledged more than the United States but Mr Powell said that Washington was "not second to anyone" in its response to disasters.
"The press is trying to make it a contest, to make it an auction, it is very unfortunate," said Mr Powell...
Heh. Of course, it's only the press who's making it a competition, and comments about the US not being second to anyone is just a comment, no competitive undercurrent whatsoever.
And then there's this bit:
But Mr Powell moved to clarify the US action after holding a video conference yesterday with Mr Annan and top UN officials to work out co-ordination issues. He told AFP that he assured the world body the US initiative would be "complementary."
"I would say that the UN will have lead international responsibility for this, but there are a lot of international groupings and organisations that will do their own thing that feed into this," he said.
Which, of course, makes perfect sense. So, having had his hand slapped for the US trying to be the UN, he battles onwards, talking nonsense.
no subject
Date: 2004-12-31 01:02 pm (UTC)Considering that the US have been a major stumbling block in dealing with the interest rate-related poverty loans to developing countries have suffered under for decades, it's hardly likely they're going to change their tune now...
no subject
Date: 2004-12-31 01:07 pm (UTC)I guess we'll have to wait and see. But this idea of it all being a competition - they seem to be propogating that all by themselves.
Have been thinking on the public donations here, too. While it's great to see such a response, BBC Children in Need raises around 30 million each year. We have 60 million people in this country - that's 50p per person. I know, I shouldn't think of it like that.
no subject
Date: 2004-12-31 06:01 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-01-01 02:54 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-12-31 12:38 pm (UTC)You're right, though. It's a power play and bandwagon jumping.