(no subject)
Dec. 1st, 2004 12:28 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
I must have a single solitary strand of optimism in me somewhere. Hard to believe, I know, but it must be so!
Otherwise why would it be that when I think an online associate of mine is an utter asshat of the first order, to the point that I voted for this person not to be allowed back on an invite-only list after she'd flamed me and flounced off, and she then not only proves herself to be the asshat I always thought she was but does it in a spectacular fashion, I'm actually a little surprised by the fact?
So, real life hasn't completely beaten my belief in the impossible out of me yet? Coolness. ;)
Otherwise why would it be that when I think an online associate of mine is an utter asshat of the first order, to the point that I voted for this person not to be allowed back on an invite-only list after she'd flamed me and flounced off, and she then not only proves herself to be the asshat I always thought she was but does it in a spectacular fashion, I'm actually a little surprised by the fact?
So, real life hasn't completely beaten my belief in the impossible out of me yet? Coolness. ;)
no subject
Date: 2004-11-30 04:50 pm (UTC)There is a reason I only read that list nowadays and completely forego posting on it.
no subject
Date: 2004-11-30 05:02 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-11-30 06:35 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-12-01 12:42 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-11-30 06:50 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-11-30 11:35 pm (UTC)Darng to democracy. And my fault because luki only reads the list once or twice a month and I forgot to nag her to vote on that poll. Darng.
no subject
Date: 2004-12-01 12:47 am (UTC)So someone was snarky to her? Big deal! Because snarky was all it was. I think she was just looking for an excuse to flounce because people weren't blindly agreeing with her every comment...
no subject
Date: 2004-12-01 05:19 am (UTC)I dunno, this won't stop as it is. Am really sorry you and a few others always end up pissed off and hurt.
no subject
Date: 2004-12-01 12:43 am (UTC)even if her sycophants won't see it that way.no subject
Date: 2004-12-01 09:08 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-12-01 09:10 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-12-01 12:03 am (UTC)As for you-know-who, doesn't she have to flounce off a list every three months to maintain the uuniversal flouncing quotient balance (UFQB) of the Stargate fandom?
no subject
Date: 2004-12-01 12:49 am (UTC)I dare say we've just provided more evidence for her revisionist history, so I suppose it's not all wasted effort... :P
no subject
Date: 2004-12-01 02:59 am (UTC)She's on ignore. Yeah, that's a shock to everyone, I expect. ;-P
no subject
Date: 2004-12-01 09:53 am (UTC):)
Nice when youre right eh?
no subject
Date: 2004-12-01 10:03 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-12-01 11:16 am (UTC)