(no subject)
Sep. 20th, 2006 10:25 pmOh no, spamming the livejournal...
Anyway, here's the thing: I'm writing a story which has a character who has amnesia (yes, just in time for my cliché panel at
connotations!) and I'm writing it in third person kind of from his point of view.
So, character A has amnesia and for a certain reason, he actually thinks he's B. Is it reasonable for me to call him B once he comes to the conclusion that's who he is (even though that conclusion is wrong, he's going to get told it's wrong but initially not believe it and then discover it is wrong), or am I stuck with calling A 'he' all the way through until he finally does get his memory back? Because I can't call him A if he doesn't know he's A, can I?
And does this make any sense at all? No? Fair enough. ;)
Anyway, here's the thing: I'm writing a story which has a character who has amnesia (yes, just in time for my cliché panel at
So, character A has amnesia and for a certain reason, he actually thinks he's B. Is it reasonable for me to call him B once he comes to the conclusion that's who he is (even though that conclusion is wrong, he's going to get told it's wrong but initially not believe it and then discover it is wrong), or am I stuck with calling A 'he' all the way through until he finally does get his memory back? Because I can't call him A if he doesn't know he's A, can I?
And does this make any sense at all? No? Fair enough. ;)
no subject
Date: 2006-09-20 09:33 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-09-23 09:11 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-09-20 09:43 pm (UTC)And then I would get it betaed to hell with a high-power microscope, because I know if it was me I'd be typing the wrong name all the damn time. :-)
no subject
Date: 2006-09-23 09:12 am (UTC)That's the problem with slash amnesia stories if you're writing them from the pov of the person who's the amnesiac! He doesn't know who he is, he doesn't know who anyone is, so it's all 'he' and 'he' and that's confusing (not to mention tedious to write if you're avoiding epithets).
no subject
Date: 2006-09-23 09:57 am (UTC)But surely the beauty of it is that you don't have to avoid the epithets! It's about the only time you can totally legitimately use 'the tall man' or 'the dark haired man' or 'the policeman' as a description for someone because that's really all the character knows about someone he's just met -- they're tall, or dark-haired, or a policeman (but turn out to actually be a stripper in police uniform). I think you should go all-out for it.
no subject
Date: 2006-09-20 09:47 pm (UTC)My creative writing profs called that "over the shoulder third person."
And yeah, I think you can call him B during to part of the story in which he thinks he is B. You could call him A or B in italics. I think it will all work.
Or,
over analyizing itto break it down further...Even though the character thinks he is B, the narrative voice does, I assume, know better. Hence he could be called A.
By calling him B in the narration, the narrative voice is getting inside his brain, so to speak. Also you might want to call him "B" or even B which indicates something in between.
no subject
Date: 2006-09-23 09:09 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-09-20 09:49 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-09-23 09:13 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-09-23 01:51 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-09-23 04:18 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-09-23 05:33 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-09-23 06:17 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-09-23 09:20 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-09-20 10:24 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-09-23 09:18 am (UTC)It seems to work, and also the first scene is heavily laced with clues for the five people who make up the WWW fandom and they'll immediately know he's A.
no subject
Date: 2006-09-20 11:52 pm (UTC)I think I've seen it written both ways. Does the reader know that he's not B? Because if the reader *does* know, then I think I would stick with calling A A. If the reader *doesn't* know, then I'd go with calling A B. I think you could carry off either though. :)
no subject
Date: 2006-09-23 09:16 am (UTC)And thanks for the vote of confidence. :)
no subject
Date: 2006-09-21 11:19 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-09-23 09:14 am (UTC)