(no subject)
Nov. 28th, 2005 06:47 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
After last week's anal pucker discussion, I was amused to discover that entertaining (or nauseating) euphemisms for sexual terms are not solely located within the worlds of fic and porn. Or at least that's what the people running the Bad Sex Awards would have you think.
Paul Theroux stands a good chance of taking the prize this year, with his description of an orgasm: "...not juice at all but a demon eel thrashing in his loins and swimming swiftly up his cock, one whole creature of live slime fighting the stiffness as it rose and bulged at the tip and darted into her mouth."
To see the other contenders, visit the report in the Guardian books section here. And yes, I do have a job that allows me to read significant chunks of the Guardian website, what's it to you? ;)
Oh, and in other news, according to Radio 1 this afternoon, the BBC have been onto Ebay about removing listings for dalek porn videos. You couldn't make this shit up! :P
Paul Theroux stands a good chance of taking the prize this year, with his description of an orgasm: "...not juice at all but a demon eel thrashing in his loins and swimming swiftly up his cock, one whole creature of live slime fighting the stiffness as it rose and bulged at the tip and darted into her mouth."
To see the other contenders, visit the report in the Guardian books section here. And yes, I do have a job that allows me to read significant chunks of the Guardian website, what's it to you? ;)
Oh, and in other news, according to Radio 1 this afternoon, the BBC have been onto Ebay about removing listings for dalek porn videos. You couldn't make this shit up! :P
no subject
Date: 2005-11-28 07:05 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-11-28 07:08 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-11-28 07:20 pm (UTC)*blinks innocently*
no subject
Date: 2005-11-28 07:31 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-11-28 09:26 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-11-28 07:28 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-11-28 07:32 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-11-28 08:02 pm (UTC)OMFG...I'm afraid this does not produce lust in my loins but rather a rapid bolt for the loo!
no subject
Date: 2005-11-28 08:09 pm (UTC)I've never understood why people need to do this sort of thing in sex scenes. It's not erotic. It's nauseating. I suppose they're afraid people will get bored reading the same type of sex scene over and over?
no subject
Date: 2005-11-28 09:11 pm (UTC)Good. Grief. Sounds like something you'd actively avoid.
no subject
Date: 2005-11-28 09:30 pm (UTC)*ew*
Does the woman in question turn lesbian afterwards? Or join a convent? She *deserves* a break.
no subject
Date: 2005-11-28 09:41 pm (UTC)This should come with a warning or better yet this should be mandatory reading in sex ed class. It would be more effective than any other form of birth control *shudders*
And that was a professional?!?
no subject
Date: 2005-11-29 04:01 am (UTC)