A brief aside...
Apr. 24th, 2004 03:23 pmBlair Sandburg is not, by any stretch of the imagination, 'exotic'.
Likewise Daniel Jackson is not 'willowy' or 'frail' or anything similar. At no point in the show's run (or even in the movie) could he be accurately described that way.
Ditto for Ezra Standish.
And let's not get started on the whole subject of competent, self-sufficient individuals bursting into tears at the slightest opportunity (be it running out of coffee, stubbing their toe, their favourite pot plant dying...).
Doesn't reading something like that just make you want to go "Have you actually *seen* the show?"?
Likewise Daniel Jackson is not 'willowy' or 'frail' or anything similar. At no point in the show's run (or even in the movie) could he be accurately described that way.
Ditto for Ezra Standish.
And let's not get started on the whole subject of competent, self-sufficient individuals bursting into tears at the slightest opportunity (be it running out of coffee, stubbing their toe, their favourite pot plant dying...).
Doesn't reading something like that just make you want to go "Have you actually *seen* the show?"?
no subject
Date: 2004-04-24 08:55 am (UTC)Are you sure? I mean, what about his... no. How about... nope. And his... er, no. Okay, fine. He's damn sexy, though.
"Likewise Daniel Jackson is not 'willowy' or 'frail' or anything similar."
I can make him willowy if I press that "resize screen" button on my remote. Of course, everyone else gets willowy too, but still. He is Is IS!
;-P
Oh, and can we add "young archaeologist" to the list of things Daniel is not. He was 30 in the movie. He's 38/39 now. He and Sam could well be called middle-aged.
Of course, watching some of the most recent Stargate episodes makes me want to ask the *show*'s writers if they've seen the show, let alone the poor deluded fic writers.
no subject
Date: 2004-04-24 08:56 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-04-24 09:47 am (UTC)Oh, and can we add "young archaeologist" to the list of things Daniel is not. He was 30 in the movie. He's 38/39 now. He and Sam could well be called middle-aged.
Dare you to go post on a certain forum about how Sam is 'middle-aged'... ;)
no subject
Date: 2004-04-24 09:50 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-04-24 09:53 am (UTC)I mean, can't anyone just be handsome anymore? Shouldn't the canonical things that made an author love a character be the traits that show up in the actual story?
I don't even want to get into what they've done to Snape.
no subject
Date: 2004-04-24 10:00 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-04-24 10:01 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-04-24 10:01 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-04-24 10:12 am (UTC)My favourite is the story where Snape is supposedly turned into a 'hermaphrodite' (although his penis is never mentioned,) grows D-cup breasts, allows himself to be raped thrice daily, and spends most of the intermittent hours curled up in a small ball, weeping. I mean...that's not Snape. At least let the poor fellow keep his penis!
no subject
Date: 2004-04-24 10:15 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-04-24 10:19 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-04-24 10:20 am (UTC)For the same reason, I guess, that Harry always has a six-pack and Quidditch-toned muscles (whatever those are - I wouldn't think that clamping your legs round a thin piece of wood would give you all that impressive upper body development, myself).
Nobody is allowed to be ordinary in fic.
no subject
Date: 2004-04-24 10:21 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-04-24 10:21 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-04-24 10:24 am (UTC)They'd wake up with important bits missing from their anatomy. If they woke up.
no subject
Date: 2004-04-24 10:25 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-04-24 10:29 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-04-24 10:31 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-04-24 10:32 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-04-24 10:36 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-04-24 10:38 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-04-24 11:14 am (UTC)Tada!
Hmm.
Doesn't look much like the originals any more. But that's okay. It's only *fiction*.
no subject
Date: 2004-04-24 12:19 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-04-24 01:08 pm (UTC)writerspeople who type words together to try to make sentences that boast about the fact that they've never seen the show!And you forgot about that Ezra is covered from head to toe in scarts from his evil Uncle. Even though it's canon that his body is loverly and toned and smooth (Hey! How many other characters walk down the Main Street in only a tablecloth!?)
no subject
Date: 2004-04-24 01:13 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-04-24 01:20 pm (UTC)The sooner it died, the better.
no subject
Date: 2004-04-24 01:37 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-04-24 04:11 pm (UTC)Gina
no subject
Date: 2004-04-24 05:18 pm (UTC)There does seem to be an attitude in some places that, you know, ONLY SLASH THE PRETTY! It's sometimes combined with a butch/femme dynamic that mimics bad bodice-rippers.
I mean, okay. It's porn. I can see people wanting to read porn about people they find attractive. OTOH, one of the things I enjoy about written porn as opposed to movie porn is the more realistic body types/physical appearances. People without silicone boobs need luv, too! ;)
no subject
Date: 2004-04-24 07:10 pm (UTC)More like a gentleman gambler/con man/sometimes lawkeeper than a cowboy, though I suppose he might have used that cover in a con at some point...
Why, yes, I am an Ezra-phile, as a matter of fact. Bet you couldn't tell. :g:
no subject
Date: 2004-04-24 07:27 pm (UTC)Of course, sometimes the word choices going in the other direction are questionable, too. Once read Ezra described as "squat." Yeah. That's a sexy image. Oy.
Some authors obviously haven't read the definitions of some of the words they use. And some authors really seem to have the need for a big man/little man physical dynamic, regardless if the actual appearances of the characters support it.
Doesn't reading something like that just make you want to go "Have you actually *seen* the show?"?
What really scares me is when such fics are applauded for their great characterizations. Makes me wonder if readers really have such lowered expectations when it comes to their fanfic. Or, if I'm in the Twilight Zone.
no subject
Date: 2004-04-25 03:26 am (UTC)Some authors obviously haven't read the definitions of some of the words they use.
That much is immediately apparent, particularly when homophones appear.
And some authors really seem to have the need for a big man/little man physical dynamic, regardless if the actual appearances of the characters support it.
You know, sometimes I'm quite glad Ezra isn't a part of the OTP of Doom, or things could be much worse!
What really scares me is when such fics are applauded for their great characterizations. Makes me wonder if readers really have such lowered expectations when it comes to their fanfic. Or, if I'm in the Twilight Zone.
Some people have the mindset, it seems, Fic = Good. Regardless of its quality or characterisation. Or they're just easily led. Or they believe the fanon over the canon, who knows?
no subject
Date: 2004-04-25 07:50 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-04-25 07:52 am (UTC)frequently.
no subject
Date: 2004-04-25 09:50 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-04-25 06:32 pm (UTC)*grin* Precisely. This is the guy who kept himself from being killed both by the Ministry and by Voldemort. Who's not afraid to throw a tantrum at the slightest affront, who apparently lives for revenge. And yet some writers seem to enjoy turning him into a pushover. Go figure.
no subject
Date: 2004-04-25 06:39 pm (UTC)Er, yeah. But to be honest, it's not the content that gets to me..it's that everyone in it is so damned out of character. *cough* That, and the fact that despite not even being edited for spelling and grammar, it gets gushing praise.
There does seem to be an attitude in some places that, you know, ONLY SLASH THE PRETTY!
The odd thing about Snape is that people seem perfectly content for him to be not-pretty, so long as he's slashed with someone who is. Even when these someones are people he's none too fond of in canon - Harry, Lupin, Black. But when he's written with equally un-pretty characters - Dumbledore, Filch, Hagrid - people give you the hairy eyeball.
Personally, I like giving the average, unattractive, interesting joes some attention too :-P
no subject
Date: 2004-04-25 08:24 pm (UTC)Yeah, sometimes I think readers will forgive just about anything as long as the plotline is entertaining and the characters have the right names, at least. But, sadly, storytelling and good writing aren't necessarily the same thing.
no subject
Date: 2004-04-26 06:10 am (UTC)*resists urge to mock "unbeat'ed" by offloading rant randomly to own journal*
Um. Where was I? :) Oh, yeah. Again, that's a nice thing about fic--people are attractive for reasons other than, say, "He looked in the mirror and admired his broad chest, his flashing blue eyes, his perfect teeth!" Oy. Like, you know, because they're interesting.
Also, I like Snape/Hagrid, so nyah. ;)
no subject
Date: 2004-04-26 10:51 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-04-27 05:33 pm (UTC)Like, oh, Frohike slash?
*evil grin*
no subject
Date: 2004-04-28 07:58 pm (UTC)Oh, I love Frohike slash. Especially Frohike/Langly. But Frohike/Byers is all right too. Mind you, the best is Frohike/Langley/Byers :-P
Geek Love!