(no subject)
Jun. 22nd, 2005 09:00 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
graculusI suppose it's too much to ask that people not display their overwhelming ignorance in public, isn't it?
Yep, thought so!
Yes, the script does say in the Stargate SG-1 episode 'Legacy' that there's no history of schizophrenia in Daniel's family and then later on in the series ('Crystal Skull') this minor point is conveniently forgotten. Because if Nick Ballard doesn't have a diagnosis of schizophrenia after what would be described as auditory and visual hallucinations and delusional thoughts, I'll eat my hat.
And, as I just pointed out on OS, 'just plain nuts' is not a recognised DSM diagnosis and therefore cannot be used to refute someone's comment that this is a continuity gaffe.
Yep, thought so!
Yes, the script does say in the Stargate SG-1 episode 'Legacy' that there's no history of schizophrenia in Daniel's family and then later on in the series ('Crystal Skull') this minor point is conveniently forgotten. Because if Nick Ballard doesn't have a diagnosis of schizophrenia after what would be described as auditory and visual hallucinations and delusional thoughts, I'll eat my hat.
And, as I just pointed out on OS, 'just plain nuts' is not a recognised DSM diagnosis and therefore cannot be used to refute someone's comment that this is a continuity gaffe.
